New below poverty line Yardstick is to be implemented

November 21, 2012 19:38
New below poverty line Yardstick is to be implemented

It seems the definition of below poverty line in India is going to be changed soon . In the wake of the Planning Commission's controversial definition of poverty last year, a new panel is likely to be formed to consider the country's socio-economic profile being brought out by the Socio Economic Caste Census (SECC) to determine the poverty line.

According to the government, 89 per cent of the SECC is completed and the census report will be ready by next month. Only three states--Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Manipur--have to complete the process that began June last year.

Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh said new poverty line would not be based on the Suresh Tendulkar Committee report and "some other line" will be there to identify the beneficiaries of government's social security programmes.

"...Where the poverty line will be drawn... that we have not decided. What we have said is that it won't be Tendulkar line. It would be some other line. So, where the povertyline will be drawn, that issue is yet to be decided," he told reporters while disclosing the progress made in caste census. Asked whether a new panel will be set up to determine beneficiaries, the Minister said it would be decided "soon" and the issue is being discussed with the Planning Commission.

According to the Planning Commission's estimates, based on the Tendulkar Committee methodology, people consuming more than Rs. 28.65 per day in cities and Rs. 22.42 in rural areas are not considered poor. The proposed yardstick had triggered a controversy and had rocked Parliament and the Planning Commission has set up an experts’ group headed by noted economist C Rangarajan to review the Tendulkar Committee methodology for estimating poverty.

(With inputs from the web)

(Aw-Jyotishman)

If you enjoyed this Post, Sign up for Newsletter

(And get daily dose of political, entertainment news straight to your inbox)

Rate This Article
(0 votes)